Tunisia has a population of 10.9 Million, of which approximately 99% are Sunni Muslims. Beside there are small Christian, Jewish, Shiite and Baha’i communities. Jewish and Christian faith (belonging to the ahl al-kitab) is in general more readily accepted by the Majority of Muslims. The Jewish community in Tunisia exists since more than 2,500 years and the synagogue on the island Djerba presents beside others an important religious site for the community. In October 2015 Tunisia was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Tunisia is a member of the League of Arab states (LAS), as well as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).

Constitution and government Education and children’s rights Family, community, society, religious courts and tribunals Freedom of expression advocacy of humanist values
Severe Discrimination
Systemic Discrimination

Constitution and government

After the Tunisian uprising in 2011, Tunisia undertook to create a new constitution. Continuing disagreement between Islamists and secularists caused delays, but it was finally agreed in January 2014. Key demands of the Islamist lobby were met, while other proposals of them were dropped. In general the influence of religion on society became more prominent in the first years after the Tunisian uprising than it was under the regime of former president Ben Ali.

The 2014 constitution begins with “In the Name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate” and ends with “And God is the guarantor of success.” The constitution is considered an expression of “commitment to the teachings of Islam”, recognizing an “Arabo-Islamic identity”, “desirous of consolidating our cultural and civilizational affiliation to the Arab and Muslim nation”. Clearly this language is exclusory of other ethnic and faith groups and flatters pan-Arabic and Islamist ambitions. Article 5 considers Tunisia as “part of the Arab Maghreb”.

Article 1 of the constitution declares that Islam is the state’s religion, and that “This article cannot be amended”, precluding any future secular reforms. Article 6 “guarantees freedom of conscience and belief, [and] the free exercise of religious practices” but stipulates that “The state is the guardian of religion”, which would appear to be a justification for blasphemy laws and the current criminalisation of any criticism of Islam. The state undertakes to disseminate “the protection of the sacred, and the prohibition of all violations thereof. It undertakes equally to prohibit and fight against calls for Takfir (Muslim accusations of apostasy against other Muslims) and the incitement of violence and hatred.” Religious freedom can be restricted in the name of protecting the rights of third parties, national defense, public security, morality, and health.

Atheists and religious minorities are banned from the presidency, which is constitutionally restricted to those who hold “Tunisian nationality since birth” and “whose religion is Islam” (Article 74). In these terms there is little improvement over the 1959 constitution, which also stipulated that the official religion is Islam and that the state sought to “remain faithful to the teachings of Islam”. There were similar provisions stating that only a Muslim could serve as president.

The government subsidizes mosques and pays the salaries of imams. Local religious committees and imams must be approved by the religious affairs directorate. The president appoints the grand mufti of the state. The government allows the Jewish community to worship freely and pays the salary of the grand rabbi. It also provides some security for all synagogues and partially subsidizes some restoration and maintenance costs. The government recognizes all Christian and Jewish religious organizations established before independence in 1956. The government permits Christian churches to operate freely, and formally recognizes the Roman Catholic Church through a 1964 concordat with the Holy See.

Education and children’s rights

Islamic religious education is mandatory in public schools. The courses on Islam present roughly one hour per week and the religious curriculum for secondary school students also includes the history of Judaism and Christianity. The state allows other religious groups to educate in private schools.

Family, community and society

Codified civil law is based on the Napoleonic code, Islamic law (Maliki law school) and customary law. As in most Muslim-majority countries, Islamic law is mainly used in family and inheritance disputes. Tunisian family law is often seen as more progressive and liberal in women right’s, than other neighbouring countries. For instance, Polygyny was already banned in the first civil code under the first president Bourguiba in the 1950s and Tunisian women enjoyed in general a more liberal divorce law, whereas other Muslim-majority countries as for instance Morocco and Egypt introduced similar reforms only after the Millennium. Islamist party representatives tried to abolish Article 18 that bans men from having more than one wife at the time in the new constitution but failed. Tunisia is beside Turkey until today the only Muslim-majority country that prohibits Polygamy. In April 2014 the government lifted its reservations in the ratification of CEDAW, declaring however, not taking any decision that would conflict with “Islam as the state religion”. In November 2015 the parliament adopted a new law allowing women to leave the country with their minor children without the permission of their father.

First president Bourguiba banned women from wearing Niqab and Hijab in schools, referring to the veil as a “miserable rag”. Later under Ben Ali as well, the ban (Article 102 of 1986) became a cause for harassment by security forces on the streets, as well as other visible signs of faith as the man’s beard. As a result for instance, university students who did not want to show their hair in public used a hat to hide it instead of the Hijab. Since 2011, however, the number of women wearing Niqab and Hijab on the streets has increased. But Islamist attacks and the resulting tightened procedural controls by the security officers of the state for security reasons led to media debates over a Niqab ban in public.

Despite these facts Tunisian women still face discrimination in law and practice, as in inheritance law. Article 227 of the Penal code allows a male rapist to escape persecution if he marries the victim and the girl is under the age of 20. Further, a mother who remarried is prohibited, unlike a remarried father, from having her children reside with her. A Muslim women is not allowed to marry a non-Muslim man, while a Muslim man can marry a Muslim, Christian or Jewish woman.

In 2012 a young woman was raped by two police officers. In the following trial she was herself accused of indecency after being alone with her fiancé at the time the police officers found her. At the end the both police officers convicted of rape were sentenced 2014 to 15 year prison terms.

Although many Tunisians are deeply religious, the anti-religious policies of the former presidents Bourguiba and Ben Ali have left traces in the Tunisian society and a quite big number of the people consider themselves as secular. These differences of opinion led in recent years during the month of Ramadan to many debates about fasting in public. In 2013 Adel Almi, a Tunisian preacher threatened to publish pictures in public of those who do not respect the fasting rules during the month of Ramadan. A big number of Tunisians reacted with a Facebook page posting pictures of themselves eating during the day. In the following years an online map was created, which marks all restaurants and coffee shops that stay open during the fasting period. Similar public uproar could be observed when controversial Egyptian cleric Wajdi Ghanim, an advocate of FGM, visited Tunisia in 2012.

The old “Mzali circular of July 1981” called for closing cafes and restaurants during Ramadan, but was that time canceled only two days after it was released by president Bourguiba. However, in the current years numerous cafe owners are harassed and intimidated by security forces for keeping their cafes open during fasting time. Former Tunisian minister of religious affairs Noureddine Khademi stated in July 2013 that opening cafes during fasting time in Ramadan was not permitted by religion and that “if a person doesn’t want to fast, he is free, but he doesn’t have the right to say it, much less do it, publicly.”

The sale of alcohol to Muslims is technically prohibited by the penal code, however, alcohol is sold freely, except on Fridays and the month of Ramadan.

Freedom of expression, advocacy of humanist values

The right to freedom of expression, including media freedom, was declared a foundational principle for the country at the dawn of the Arab Spring. In practice, this freedom remains contested, with more conservative and religious groups opposing expressions that criticize Islam or traditional social conventions. It remains to be seen whether the new constitution will provide the legal and institutional framework to better protect freedom of expression.

The constitution provides for freedom of conscience and free practice of religion (Article 31) when it “does not disturb public order.” It is illegal for non-Muslims to proselytize Muslims, as the government views such efforts as “disturbing the public order.” The penal code restricts the freedom of speech by criminalizing speech that “causes harm to the public morals”. Another provision of the penal code criminalizes undermining public morals by “intentionally disturbing other persons in a way that offends the sense of public decency.” The telecommunications code criminalizes “harming others or disrupting their lives through public communication networks.” Speech that is deemed offensive to traditional religious values, including speech deemed blasphemous, is prosecuted under these provisions.Citizens have the right to sue the government for violations of religious freedom.

In August 2012, the ruling party, the Islamist party Ennahdha, filed an anti-blasphemy bill which would criminalise “curses, insults mockery, and desecration” of numerous religious concepts, including Allah, the Prophets, the three Abrahamic books, the Sunnah (the practices of the Prophet Muhammad), churches, synagogues and the Kaaba (the most sacred building in Islam). The idea and debate spread after the opening of an art exhibit in the capital of Tunis that was deemed offensive to Islam. The bill also banned pictorial representation of God and Prophet Muhammad. The stated reason for the proposal was to protect Tunisia’s Islamic identity. However, the blasphemy bill did not have enough support and was dropped.

Further, violence and Islamist attacks have plagued Tunisia’s transition since 2011. In 2013 two secular politicians were shot dead. Islamists have burned several religious (Sufi) shrines since 2011. The latest Islamist attacks in 2015 on the Bardo museum in Tunis and the shooting of western tourists in a beach hotel in Sousse have killed dozens and seriously harmed Tunisian tourism. Several deadly attacks on Tunisian security forces in the Western part of the country took place leading to the restriction of freedoms of expression and association on counterterrorism grounds.

Although religious conversion is legal, some converts express concerns about threats of violence and a lot of societal pressure against Muslims leaving their religion.

Highlighted cases

On 28 March, 2012, two atheist friends, Jabeur Mejri and Ghazi Beji were sentenced to seven and a half years in prison, and to a large fine, for posting images on Facebook deemed blasphemous. Mejri and Beji were put on trial following a complaint lodged by a group of residents in Mahdia. While Jabeur Mejri is in prison, his friend Ghazi Beji sought refuge in Europe. Mejri and Beji were convicted under Article 121 (3) of the Tunisian Penal Code, which states that:“The distribution, putting up for sale, public display, or possession, with the intent to distribute, sell, display for the purpose of propaganda, tracts, bulletins, and fliers, whether of foreign origin or not, that are liable to cause harm to the public order or public morals is prohibited.” After two years of international uproar and media attention, Jabeur Mejri received a presidential pardon in 2014.

On May 3, 2012, Nabil Karoui was convicted for disrupting public order and violating moral values by airing Persepolis an animated film that some religious leaders say insults Islam. Karoui, the head of Nessma TV a private television station, was ordered to pay a 2,400 dinar (US$1,500) fine.

In 2012, when Sofiene Chourabi, a democracy activist and journalist, called for a protest against the explicit blasphemy law proposed by Ennahdha, he was arrested the next day for “drinking alcohol during Ramadan”, which is not a crime under Tunisian law.


“I will not shout from the rooftops that I am irreligious, but I don’t hide it. I am not obliged to tell it to everybody, because I think it is a personal thing. What would it help to tell it to my university colleagues for instance? It would just cause more problems for me. Anyway, if there are discussion on science, politics, or religion, you can figure out very fast that I am agnostic. Honestly, I don’t have a real problem due to my religious convictions. I have friends that are practising Muslims and female friends that wear the Hijab and they accept me as I am. At high school it was not always easy, but I think this was more linked to the fact that as a teenager we all tend to be a little bit mean.”

— Sarah

“I don’t talk a lot about my atheism. If I tell it to certain people, it is people with a certain intellectual level or very tolerant people, otherwise I would be marginalized and rejected by the most part of society. You shouldn’t tell that you are an atheist if it concerns your work or professional life, because you would risk rejection. My family is very understanding and my mother is an atheist as well, however that is not the case for all atheists and the most of their parents don’t know that their children are atheists. It is like in other developing countries, there is no tolerance and especially none for minorities.”

— Ahmed