The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is an Islamic state governed by an absolute monarchy in tandem with a powerful religious elite. Since 2014 Saudi law defines “the promotion of atheism” as an act of “terrorism”. Accusations of apostasy or promoting atheism have been made in recent years, with individuals facing possible death sentences and serving long jail terms.

The Saudi government has claimed to be making improvements in terms of respecting civil liberties and human rights; however most improvements have been minimal, and a highly restrictive regime persists. In 2017 the Crown Prince pledged reforms including to lift the ban on women driving, however many human rights campaigners and prisoners of conscience remain behind bars. Most forms of public religious expression must be consistent with the government’s particular brand of Sunni Islam.

Saudi Arabia is a member of the League of Arab States (LAS), the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).

Constitution and government Education and children’s rights Family, community, society, religious courts and tribunals Freedom of expression advocacy of humanist values
 
Grave Violations
Severe Discrimination
Systemic Discrimination

Constitution and government

The monarchy of the house of Al Saud holds supreme political authority, existing by formal arrangement in tandem with a highly influential clerical bloc (the Ulema) lead by the house of Al ash-Sheikh.

This monarchical-religious symbiosis was forged under an oath sworn by both families dating back to 1744, to this day considered the founding basis of the “pact” between both houses. The pact commits the house of Al Saud to “perform jihad against the unbelievers”, while “in return” Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab (the founder of Wahhabism) would be “leader in religious matters” in perpetuity.
<goo.gl/UF0IiF> [A History of Saudi Arabia, Madawi al-Rasheed]

There is no freedom of religion or belief in Saudi Arabia. Wahhabism – commonly described as an “ultra conservative” or “fundamentalist” branch of Sunni Islam – is functionally recognized as the state religion. According to Article 1 of the Basic Law of Saudi Arabia (its equivalent to a constitution), “The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a sovereign Arab Islamic state with Islam as its religion; God’s Book and the Sunnah of His Prophet (God’s prayers and peace be upon him) are its constitution.”

The country’s laws are based on Sharia law.

Human rights violations

With a population of 29 million, the Kingdom is one of 12 countries given “the worst-possible rating of 7 for both political rights and civil liberties” by Freedom House (2015).
<freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2015/saudi-arabia>

Saudi Arabia is routinely and severely criticised by many human rights organizations internationally, including for the poor treatment of migrant workers, massive religious and political suppression of freedom of thought, expression, and association, and especially women’s rights (including a ban on women driving and a semi-formalized “guardianship” system which robs women of privacy and freedom of movement), as well as maintaining an unfair and unpredictable justice system that is often utilized to punitively suppress human rights advocacy and to crush any sign of political dissent.

In a government reshuffle under new King Salman in 2015, the head of the Mutaween (religious police), Sheikh Abdul Latif al-Sheikh, considered to be somewhat sympathetic to women’s rights, was replaced by Abdulrahman al-Sanad, who was previously sacked by King Abdullah on grounds of his criticism of intermingling young men and women in co-ed universities. King Salman also appointed as his personal adviser the controversial cleric Saad al-Shethri, known as a hardliner against Christians, Jews, and Shiites. The female Deputy Minister for Education was also removed (see “Education and children’s rights”, below) with no new women being appointed. These moves were widely seen as entrenching or setting back the reform agenda.
<middleeasteye.net/news/new-saudi-king-orders-cabinet-reshuffle-280880866>
<ansamed.info/ansamed/en/news/sections/politics/2015/03/03/saudi-arabia-education-minister-says-no-to-sports-for-girls_1dcbf24c-8f27-4270-9e8f-01c56c158cae.html>

Since then, Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, designated in June 2017 as the successor to King Salman, has apparently orchestrated a series of arrests in what has been described by the House of Saud as an anti-corruption purge, though many commentators regard it as a crackdown on the Crown Prince’s likely opponents and detractors. In 2017 the Crown Prince pledged some liberalizing reforms, including an end to the ban on women driving, though they will take some time to implement. It remains unclear how deep or serious the push for reform is and whether it heralds an approach more accepting of human rights.

Geopolitical power

Despite its severe deficit on civil liberties and human rights, Saudi Arabia nevertheless retains a high Human Development Index, largely thanks to its massive oil export industry, and a sizeable population of expatriate workers. The population includes 2.5 million Bangladeshis who migrated in the main after the war for independence, in which Saudi provided significant support against the Bengali nationalist call for independence.

Saudi Arabia has lukewarm, rocky or outright hostile relations with a number of other Middle Eastern countries, in particular Iran.

Outside the region, its close political allies and major trading partners (often themselves highly dependent on Saudi oil exports) include: China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Pakistan, Singapore, South Korea (with Asia importing 66% of total Saudi oil exports); Canada and the United States (with North America importing 17% of total Saudi oil exports); Belgium, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, and United Kingdom (with Europe importing 12% of total Saudi oil exports) (as of 2013 figures).
<atlas.media.mit.edu/en/profile/country/sau/>

Early in 2015 the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia along with the GCC countries (except Oman) went to war in Yemen. The air campaign has been widely accused of indiscriminate bombing with significant civilian casualties. In September 2015, the Saudi coalition struck a wedding party killing 135 people and many more incidents of bombing in densely populated areas causing numerous casualties are widely regarded as probable war crimes.
<aljazeera.com/news/2015/10/yemen-151007015252750.html>
<foreignpolicy.com/2015/10/15/u-s-support-for-saudi-strikes-in-yemen-raises-war-crime-concerns/>

The Saudi coalition is accused of obstructing humanitarian aid, blocking supplies coming in from the Persian Gulf and creating famine and disease. Amnesty International testifies to the use of cluster bombs. The conflict falls along sectarian lines, testing the regional balance of power between Sunnis and Shiites.
<amnesty.org/en/press-releases/2015/10/yemen-call-for-suspension-of-arms-transfers-to-coalition-and-accountability-for-war-crimes/>

Education and children’s rights

The problem of propagation of religious hatred in the classroom remains significant in Saudi Arabia. According to the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, the textbooks used in secondary schools from 2013 to 2014 “continued to teach hatred toward members of other religions and, in some cases, promote violence. For example, some justified violence against apostates and polytheists and labelled Jews and Christians ‘enemies.’
<http://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/USCIRF%202014%20Annual%20Report%20PDF.pdf>

Since the first girls’ schools were founded in the 1960s, until 2002, girls’ education was controlled under the auspices of the Directorate of Girls’ Education managed by the religious Ulama. Girls’ education has been closely linked to the state religion administered by the Wahhabi religious hierarchy:

“The purpose of educating a girl is to bring her up in a proper Islamic way so as to perform her duty in life, be an ideal and successful housewife and a good mother, ready to do things which suit her nature such as teaching, nursing and medical treatment.”
— Helen Chapin Metz, ed. Saudi Arabia: A Country Study. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress, 1992

In 2002, in an incident known as the Meccas girls’ school fire, the Saudi religious police prevented girls from evacuating their school during a fire, insisting that they must obey the religious dress code. 15 girls were killed in the blaze.
<hrw.org/news/2002/03/14/saudi-arabia-religious-police-role-school-fire-criticized>

As a response, King Abdullah removed Saudi girls’ schools from the religious authorities. Since 2002 girls’ education has been the responsibility of the Ministry of Education also responsible for boys’ education.

In 2009 King Abdullah appointed a female Deputy Minister in charge of girls’ schooling, namely Norah Al-Faiz. She was the first woman to chair at ministerial level. However, in 2015 in a government reshuffle, King Salman dismissed Norah Al-Faiz, after her work on the cause of girls’ sports programmes in state-run schools prompted opposition by religious conservatives. No women were appointed in the new government setting.The newly appointed Minister of Education Ministry, Azzam Al-Dakhil, vowed not to allow sporting activities for girls in public schools.

Family, community and society

Public non-Muslim places of worship are not allowed, and the right of non-Muslims to practice their religion in private is not fully protected. The intractable connection between state identity, the ruling royal family and the religious establishment results in significant pressure on all citizens to adhere to the official government interpretation of Islam. Rejection of that interpretation is conceived of as rejection of the instruments of the state or sedition.

Religious police

The Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice (CPVPV), which enforces public morality and restrictions on public religious manifestations and practice, is known for being especially intolerant of minority religions and disbelief. It is not subject to judicial review and reports directly to the King.

In 2016 following public outcry at incidents of the ‘police’ acting beyond their remit and subjecting individuals to harassment, detainment, beatings and lashings, their powers were curbed and their presence on the streets was greatly diminished.

A year later, many celebrated the anniversary of their fading. However others reportedly welcomed their gradual return later in 2017, albeit with diminished powers.
<arabnews.com/node/1076321/saudi-arabia>
<bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-26/saudi-religious-police-return-just-with-a-little-less-vengeance>

Freedom of expression, advocacy of humanist values

Despite the huge predominance of religion over political and social affairs, a widely-cited 2012 poll found that nearly 25% of Saudi Arabians interviewed identified as non-religious, including 5% prepared to described themselves as “A convinced atheist”.
<redcresearch.ie/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/RED-C-press-release-Religion-and-Atheism-25-7-12.pdf>

Blasphemy and apostasy

“Blasphemy” is conceived as a deviation from Sunni Islam and thus may also be treated as “apostasy”. Apostasy is criminalized and mandates a death penalty, and the criminal accusation of “apostasy” is sometimes deployed against people (including writers, activists, artists, or lawyers) who show any serious sign of pushing at the outer boundaries of freedom of expression, or who are critical of the religious authorities, and whose views (rightly or wrongly) are termed “atheist” or as “insulting to religion”. The death sentence (usually by beheading and crucifixion) is also used to address “crimes” of “witchcraft” and “sorcery”.

Atheism and “terrorism”

In March 2014, the Government brought into law new anti-terrorism legislation, which defines atheism as terrorism. Article 1 of the new law defines one form of terrorism as: “Calling for atheist thought in any form, or calling into question the fundamentals of the Islamic religion on which this country is based.” Since the government system is grounded in Wahhabi interpretations of Islam, non-believers are assumed to be enemies of the Saudi state.

This legislation not only frames non-believers as terrorists but, along with related royal decrees, creates a legal framework that outlaws as terrorism nearly all thought or expression critical of the government and its understanding of Islam.

“Saudi authorities have never tolerated criticism of their policies, but these recent laws and regulations turn almost any critical expression or independent association into crimes of terrorism…”

— Joe Stork, deputy Middle East and North Africa Director, Human Rights Watch
<hrw.org/news/2014/03/20/saudi-arabia-new-terrorism-regulations-assault-rights>

Freedom of expression, advocacy of humanist values

The punishment for any perceived criticism of the ruling family or the state’s interpretation of Islam is harsh and often secret or obscure in nature. Accordingly, many cases and convictions for free thought and expression are not made public which makes it very difficult to accurately report on the full extent of Saudi repression.

Following a 2011 amendment to the country’s press law by a royal decree, the press is prohibited from criticizing the government or related officials, with violations potentially resulting in fines or forced closures of the press concerned. Articles deemed offensive to the religious establishment or the ruling authorities are prohibited. Domestic media are controlled by the state. The royal family owns major stakes in news outlets in multiple countries, providing them with a dominant regional influence.

The government has also sought to control online media, blocking access to hundreds of thousands of websites, which it considers immoral or politically sensitive. All websites, blogs and anyone posting news or commentary online are required by law to have a license from the Ministry of Information. Failure to do so, can result in a fine or possible closure of the website concerned.

There have been numerous arrests and convictions for social media comments, postings, and  activism by human rights defenders, many falling under a vague “state security” classification precluding them from royal pardons.
<amnestyusa.org/news/news-item/saudi-arabia-must-release-all-prisoners-of-conscience-immediately-and-unconditionally-irrespective-o>

Other Human Rights Issues

Saudi Arabia has not ratified the ‘International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ nor the ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’, however, it is a party to the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (UNCAT).

Excessive police powers without judicial oversight and increasing lack of free expression have been worsened by the Penal Law for Crimes of Terrorism and its Financing (the “terrorism law”), with its vague and overly broad provisions.

The rights to freedom of assembly and association are denied in practice. The government frequently detains political activists who stage demonstrations or engage in other civic advocacy.

LGBT people are denied the right to sexual autonomy. Married men are prohibited from engaging in homosexual acts and can be stoned to death for such acts. As can non-Muslims who commit “sodomy” with a Muslim. Other punishments handed out to those found guilty of homosexuality include chemical castrations, imprisonment and execution. In 2014, a Saudi Arabian man was sentenced to three years in jail and 450 lashes after he was caught using Twitter to arrange dates with other men. A court in Medina, convicted him on the charge of  “promoting the vice and practice of homosexuality.” The newspaper Al-Watan reported that the man was arrested following an entrapment ploy by the CPVPV.

Some women continue to protest for the right to drive and move in public without a chaperone. But despite the Kingdom sometimes saying it has made progress on women’s rights, those protesting have sometimes been met with punitive treatment. In December 2014, Loujain Hathloul and Maysaa Alamoudi were arrested at the border with the United Arab Emirates for driving. Their case was referred to the Specialized Criminal Court, which deals primarily with cases related to state security and terrorism.

Highlighted cases

In 2017 a death sentence for “atheism” was upheld against Ahmad Al Shamri. He was convicted of apostasy in February 2015, having been arrested on charges of ‘atheism and blasphemy’ for allegedly uploading a series of videos on social media in 2014. Shamri, in his 20s, from the town of Hafar al-Batin, made an insanity plea deal. His defence added that Shamri was under the influence of drugs and alcohol at the time of making the videos. However, he lost the appeals court case and the supreme court ruled against him in April 2017.
<iheu.org/man-sentenced-death-atheism-saudi-arabia/>
<independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-man-sentenced-death-atheism-ahmad-al-shamri-hafar-al-batin-appeal-denied-a7703161.html>

In November 2015, Palestinian poet and artist Ashraf Fayadh was sentenced to death for “apostasy”, a sentence to be carried out by beheading by sword. Fayadh, a member of the British-Saudi art organization Edge of Arabia, was first arrested in August 2013, in connection with his poetry. In a series of trials he has been accused of “spreading atheism”, insulting “the divine self”, insulting the Prophet Muhammad, discrediting the Quran and Hadith, and objecting to concepts of fate as acts of God. Even “having long hair” has been cited against him, as well as supposedly “having relationships” with women and having photographs of them on his mobile phone (the photographs appear to be simple side-by-side photographs with friends and colleagues). Despite having no access to a lawyer and thus violating the right to a fair trial, at the conclusion of the retrial, on 24 November 2015, Fayadh was sentenced to death. He has said he will appeal.
<pen-international.org/11/2015/saudi-arabia-sentences-poet-to-death/>
<arablit.org/2015/01/13/imprisoned-poet-ashraf-fayadhs-frida-kahlos-mustache/>
<esohr.org/en/?p=658>

In December 2013, Raif Badawi, a blogger and creator of a “Liberal Saudi” blogging platform, intended to foster debate on religion and politics, was accused of “apostasy” and eventually sentenced to 10 years in prison, 1,000 lashes with a fine of 1 million Saudi riyals for “insulting Islam”. Badawi was first jailed in 2012 for violating Saudi Arabia’s IT law and insulting religious authorities through his online writings and hosting those of others on his website. His sentence at that time was 7 years in prison and 600 lashes. There has been an international outcry over Badawi’s case, with many civil rights groups including IHEU and many states including Canada and the USA, raising his plight at the UN Human Rights Council.
<iheu.org/un-iheu-calls-immediate-release-saudi-prisoners-badawi-fayadh-al-shamri/>

Raif Badawi’s lawyer, Waleed Abu al-Khair, was imprisoned for “breaking allegiance with the king,” “making international organizations hostile to the kingdom,” and “setting up an unlicensed organization.”

In 2012, a Saudi journalist and poet, Hamza Kashghari, was extradited from Malaysia and imprisoned without trial for twenty months due to a series of tweets considered by the authorities to be insulting toward the Prophet Mohammed. Another poet, Ashraf Fayadh, was jailed without charge in January 2014 after someone suggested that his poems contained “atheist ideas”.